Princeton University Users: If you would like to view a senior thesis while you are away from campus, you will need to connect to the campus network remotely via the Global Protect virtual private network (VPN). If you are not part of the University requesting a copy of a thesis, please note, all requests are processed manually by staff and will require additional time to process.
 

Publication:

The Capacity Factor Delta: Equity Market Reaction to Weather-Induced Power Outages in Electricity-Generating Firms

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Files

Sutton_Jason_The Capacity Factor Delta_Equity Market Reactioin to Weather-Induced Power Outages in Electricity-Generating Firms.pdf (1.37 MB)

Date

2025-04-10

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

This paper employs a quasi-experimental event study design that analyzes the equity market reactions to severe weather events in electricity-generating firms via average cumulative abnormal returns and dynamic average treatment effects on the treated (ATT). It uses a novel treatment identification strategy by assembling a treatment zone of severe weather events using individually reported storm locations. Treatment is assigned to power plants within 100 miles of the path of the power-outage inducing storm, then traced to firms for the treatment group via ownership data. The findings are as follows: [1] The average cumulative abnormal returns for both the treatment group firms and the control group firms were significant, at -1.57% and -1.09%, respectively, indicating a negative equity market reaction to severe weather events. [2] The treated renewable firms (-2.38%) earned significantly lower cumulative abnormal returns as compared to the control group of renewable firms. [3] Asymmetrically, the control group fossil fuel firms earned significant lower cumulative abnormal returns (-2.43%) as compared to the fossil fuel treatment group. [4] The ATT for event-day 20 was significant across all observations, renewable firms, and fossil fuel firms, indicating significant positive abnormal return ATTs for the treatment group of 0.24%, 0.11%, and 0.37%, respectively. Findings [1] and [2] support the hypotheses of the study that treated groups would underperform control groups and that renewable energy firms would outperform fossil fuel firms. Findings [3] and [4] oppose the hypotheses of the study but could be explained by extrapolatory beliefs and stimulatory effects of emergency stimulus efforts to restore the grid.

Description

Keywords

Citation