Princeton University users: to view a senior thesis while away from campus, connect to the campus network via the Global Protect virtual private network (VPN). Unaffiliated researchers: please note that requests for copies are handled manually by staff and require time to process.
 

Publication:

Bad Allies: LGBTQ Perspectives on Allied Behavior that Fails

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Files

senior_thesis.pdf (713.32 KB)

Date

2025-04-21

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Access Restrictions

Abstract

Allies are individuals who advocate on the behalf of a marginalized community that they are not a member of. Historically, allies have been essential in social justice efforts for the LGBT+ community and movements for that community. However, allies can sometimes fail to meet the expectations of LGBT+ communities; a reality that I refer to as failed allyship. Study 1 identifies approval-seeking behavior as a key marker of failed allyship, suggesting that perceived insincerity undermines the legitimacy of allyship efforts. Study 2 suggests that prejudice directed specifically toward transgender, nonbinary, and gender nonconforming individuals indicates selective support within the broader LGBT+ community. A recurring theme across both studies is the role of misinformation, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive and inclusive educational interventions. Together, these findings challenge the assumption that self-identification as an ally equates to meaningful support, and instead call for a more critical and informed approach to allyship.

Description

Keywords

Citation