Publication:

McGeer and Hurley on Self-Knowledge and Responsibility

datacite.rightsrestricted
dc.contributorDasgupta, Shamik
dc.contributor.advisorSmith, Michael
dc.contributor.authorSims, Lauren
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-20T12:56:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-30T00:11:06Z
dc.date.available2016-07-20T12:56:33Z
dc.date.available2026-09-30T00:11:06Z
dc.date.created2016-04-04
dc.date.issued2016-07-20
dc.description.abstractWhat does empirical, psychological research on situated rationality mean for contemporary theories of self-knowledge and moral responsibility in philosophy? In this paper, I consider four cases of non-deliberative thought and action — stereotype threat, implicit bias, unreflective voting decisions, and manipulative advertising practices that lead to harm. Extending Victoria McGeer’s points in The Moral Development of First-Person Authority, I clarify how supporting democratic policies that mitigate unwanted effects of these judgments can develop our own self-knowledge and capacity for individual responsibility.en_US
dc.format.extent41 pages*
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01s7526f88k
dc.identifier.urihttps://theses-dissertations.princeton.edu/handle/88435/dsp01s7526f88k
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleMcGeer and Hurley on Self-Knowledge and Responsibilityen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses
dspace.entity.typePublication
pu.date.classyear2016en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sims._LJ_SeniorThesis.pdf
Size:
2.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download