Publication:

The Dogma of Reasons Fundamentalism A Critique of Thomas M. Scanlon’s Metaethics

datacite.rightsrestricted
dc.contributor.advisorSmith, Michael
dc.contributor.authorJubas, Benjamin
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-17T14:55:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-30T00:10:31Z
dc.date.available2014-07-17T14:55:24Z
dc.date.available2026-09-30T00:10:31Z
dc.date.created2014-03-31
dc.date.issued2014-07-17
dc.description.abstractIn his book Being Realistic About Reasons, T.M. Scanlon argues for a form of normative realism known as “reasons fundamentalism.” I attack the integrity of the domain-dependent metaphysics he adopts to support this view, and argue that a sufficiently sophisticated form of expressivism might be preferable to reasons fundamentalism.en_US
dc.format.extent62en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01fn106z12c
dc.identifier.urihttps://theses-dissertations.princeton.edu/handle/88435/dsp01fn106z12c
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleThe Dogma of Reasons Fundamentalism A Critique of Thomas M. Scanlon’s Metaethicsen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses
dspace.entity.typePublication
pu.date.classyear2014en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JubasBenST14.pdf
Size:
259.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download