Publication: Waning Growth Impact of Real Exchange Rate: Why a Real Undervaluation Has Never Spurred Economic Growth in Nigeria
Files
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Access Restrictions
Abstract
With the pressure from international multilateral organizations, like the IMF and
the World Bank, for Nigeria to devalue its currency in order to experience a stronger
economic growth and Nigeria's subsequent adamancy to obey; I explore the relationship
between real exchange rate and growth, bearing in mind that a nominal currency
devaluation or appreciation has a real effect. I address the following questions to
uncover if Nigeria's defiance is justified:
What is the relationship between real exchange rate and economic growth?
Does this relationship hold true for developing nations ‐ specifically defined, in
my research, as the very poorest ‐ ? Finally, if there is a relationship, does this
relationship apply to countries dependent on natural resources?
My research presents four main facts:
( i ) there is a general negative relationship between real exchange rate and
growth (ie. a real undervaluation stimulates growth while a real overvaluation
hampers growth); ( ii ) this relationship is very strong for richer countries and very
weak for poorer countries; ( iii ) this relationship fades away in the later time
period considered in my research (2005‐2016); ( iv ) this relationship never holds
true for countries dependent on natural resources.
Given these facts, I explore the channels through which real exchange rate could
affect economic growth in richer countries but not in poorer countries or
resource‐dependent countries. By building a simple analytical model, I find that an
increase in exports is the most likely channel through which real exchange rate impacts
economic growth in richer countries. A real undervaluation leads to an increase in
exports for richer countries but not for poorer countries because of the difference in
export demand elasticity ‐ richer countries have a price elastic demand for their exports
while poorer countries have a price inelastic demand for their exports. Furthermore, I
suggest that the decline in export and economic growth impact of real exchange rate in
recent times is due to a possible shift in export demand elasticity, from price elastic to
price inelastic. Finally, I apply these facts on Nigeria to conclude that Nigeria is justified
in holding off against undervaluation as long as the benefits of her actions outweigh the
costs.