Make Way for the Tigress: An Analysis of Women-Centered Policy Change at Princeton University

Abstract

This thesis represents an in-depth analysis of Princeton University’s policymaking process as it pertains to women-centered issues. Within its policy deliberations, Princeton often encountered a fundamental tension between its traditionalist commitment to masculinity and its desire to appear as a leading, prestigious, and societally-respected institution. Historically, how does Princeton respond to this tension? In policy decisions which place traditional, alumni-lauded values at odds with its perceived educational status, I will argue that the administration reveal a risk-averse tendency to pursue a “middle ground” policy route. Given Princeton’s enduring culture of masculinity, the women-centered policy developments analyzed in the present thesis provide key instances of Princeton contending with opposing interests. To arrive at my characterization of Princeton’s policymaking strategy, the present thesis relies primarily on archival, primary-source-based analysis. Reports commissioned by the University, internal correspondence, and numerous student-penned articles reveal priorities of Princeton policymakers over the course of several decades. The policy developments analyzed are as follows: the implementation of undergraduate coeducation at Princeton University, the coeducation of Princeton’s social and dining clubs, and the creation of a Princeton women’s studies program. In each case, Princeton took a risk-averse, middle road approach, pursuing policies sufficiently progressive and academically enhancing so as to preserve its top-tier institutional status, yet sufficiently moderate so as to avoid making overwhelming political statements or disgruntling alumni. Ultimately, the present analysis offers a framework for understanding when and how Princeton will be compelled to adopt progressive policies, an insight which can be applied to future policy developments.