Princeton University Users: If you would like to view a senior thesis while you are away from campus, you will need to connect to the campus network remotely via the Global Protect virtual private network (VPN). If you are not part of the University requesting a copy of a thesis, please note, all requests are processed manually by staff and will require additional time to process.
 

Publication:

Prior Consultation Frameworks and Green Extractivism in Latin America: A Case Study of Guatemalan Hydroelectric Projects Post-1996

dc.contributor.advisorTunon, Guadalupe
dc.contributor.authorCarpenter, Noelle
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-01T14:47:05Z
dc.date.available2025-08-01T14:47:05Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractGreen extractivism, a term attributed to Uruguayan social ecologist Eduardo Gudynas, refers to a process that reproduces and reifies existing material inequalities through the exploitation, dispossession and neocolonialism by development projects categorized as “green” or “sustainable.” The framework refers to a wide encompassing array of industries including hydroelectric power, critical materials, agriculture, and infrastructure. This framework is consolidated by Alexander Dunlap to describe an evolved form of capital accumulation designed to accommodate new political ideologies and priorities associated with global anthropogenic climate change. Existing legal frameworks in Latin America and the Global South, namely the International Labor Organization Convention no. 169, and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), normatively empower Indigenous Peoples (IP) to exert their land and resource rights in the face of green extractivist projects through the process of prior consultation, or consulta previa, and Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC). This paper employs a mixed-method approach to a case study of Guatemalan consultation procedures and their relationship to the emerging green extractive model. Using quantitative data in the form of a compiled dataset of hydroelectric projects on Indigenous territory in Guatemala, and a comparative analysis of mining and hydroelectric projects in Guatemala, I find that hydroelectric mega-projects are subject to less intense scrutiny in the consultation process than other extractive industries in Guatemala, specifically mining, firmly placing them within the extractive model. Furthermore, I recommend that the principles of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent should be regarded as the dominant framework, beyond “soft law,” to inform consultation proceedings with Indigenous Peoples ahead of extractive projects.
dc.identifier.urihttps://theses-dissertations.princeton.edu/handle/88435/dsp01028710304
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titlePrior Consultation Frameworks and Green Extractivism in Latin America: A Case Study of Guatemalan Hydroelectric Projects Post-1996
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses
dspace.entity.typePublication
dspace.workflow.startDateTime2025-04-08T15:43:43.411Z
pu.contributor.authorid920275863
pu.date.classyear2025
pu.departmentPublic & International Affairs

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Carpenter Senior Thesis .pdf
Size:
2.37 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
100 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:
Download